Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 12

< November 11	November 13 >

November 12

File:King Bhumibol Adulyadej.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:King Bhumibol Adulyadej.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Monarchians (notify | contribs).

No evidence that the Bureau of the Royal Household released this photo under the GFDL. Uploader has not responded to this question. (There are plenty of free alternatives.) HaeB (talk) 01:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I've dealt with this uploader before. We'll never get an answer to this, or any other, question. For what it's worth, all of this user's uploads with the same source/licensing setup should probably be deleted. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3110 shown from frount.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3110 shown from frount.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Urailes0623 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, low quality. No encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 03:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this low-quality, orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:3dMook1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:3dMook1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Robowl (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no target article. — ξ ^xplicit 03:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm wondering why this was uploaded in the first place. I can't find any record of an article on The Mook Brothers or Mook Brothers, deleted speedily or otherwise. Absent such an article, this image is permanently orphaned and ought to be deleted. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aaron j nicoli.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aaron j nicoli.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aaron J Nicoli (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 03:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AFCKMRS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AFCKMRS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Andreadecordova (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 03:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BSWG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:BSWG.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fortunato luigi (notify | contribs).

Image fails WP:NFCC#8, provides no encyclopedic information that could not be adequately be described by text. "Visual companion", as described in the rationale, is basically another way of saying "decorative". Mosmof (talk) 04:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Duh!thats why the summary information about the picture says "No information as far as copyright or owner of image is given (visibly) on the site. One can assume the image being upload is a free image, however, it would be safer to list the image as a non-free image, under the assumption of "Fair Use and Internet"." because is not shown the copyright of the pictures. Even if its a fan site you could use them under fair use, given the fact that is an screenshoot, or what, are you saying that people how takes an screenshoot of something owns the rights? No, of course no, the TV show and its related own them, that why I put this picture under "non-free tv screenshoot". Its all there, so stop trying to delete that image. Fortunato luigi (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's not a free image, first of all, so let's put that to bed. It's a screenshot of a copyrighted TV show, ergo it is copyrighted. The next test it must pass, then, is whether it adds anything significant that a free image couldn't possibly provide (WP:NFCC). The answer is very clearly no. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:28, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia guidelines are very clear on this. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aggi dukes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aggi dukes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SilencerRemix (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no target article. — ξ ^xplicit 04:20, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Crazy 2ktour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crazy 2ktour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fortunato luigi (notify | contribs).

Seriously specious fair use rationale. The uploader claims the image is a "visual companion", which suggests this is a decorative image. Also the source isn't really a source, but a fan site that takes other people's intellectual property and half-heartedly asks copyright holders to claim ownership. Mosmof (talk) 04:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Duh!thats why the summary information about the picture says "No information as far as copyright or owner of image is given (visibly) on the site. One can assume the image being upload is a free image, however, it would be safer to list the image as a non-free image, under the assumption of "Fair Use and Internet"." because is not shown the copyright of the pictures. Even if its a fan site you could use them under fair use, given the fact that is an screenshoot, or what, are you saying that people how takes an screenshoot of something owns the rights? No, of course no, the TV show and its related own them, that why I put this picture under "non-free tv screenshoot". Its all there, so stop trying to delete that image. Fortunato luigi (talk) 16:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my commentary two sections above (same uploader, same rationale). (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The image exif data on the full-sized original clearly states "THIS COPYRIGHTED IMAGE MUST NOT BE USED WITHOUT PERMISSION" and "Mandatory Credit: Photo By REX FEATURES BRITNEY SPEARS BRITNEY SPEARS IN PARIS, FRANCE - 2000". Image fails WP:NFCC#2 by a huge margin as well as the issues raised above. Peripitus (Talk) 22:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)][reply]

^^That a lie, i just saw the original picture and that is not on it. Your are a lier. Fortunato luigi (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rubbish. Using FxiF in Firefox I can see the text I have written above. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Everyone, including the uploader, agrees that the image is copyrighted. However, the use of non-free photographs of living persons on Wikipedia is strictly limited, and unfortunately just because an editor thinks that a non-free image of a living person would make an article look better is not a sufficient reason for using it. The non-free content criteria must be complied with. In this case, in addition to NPCC#2, the image appears to violate NPCC#1 and NPCC#8 as well. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:39, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ain-Diab.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ain-Diab.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WikiPino (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 04:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Looks like a map of a racetrack - I'd say that we leave it to allow the uploader to give us more information on it. Colds7ream (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader hasn't made an edit since September 2008. Chances are this user won't come back anytime soon. — ξ ^xplicit 04:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bsdwad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bsdwad.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fortunato luigi (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and #10. The uploader claims the image is a "visual companion", which suggests this is a decorative image. Also the source isn't really a source, but a fan site that takes other people's intellectual property and half-heartedly asks copyright holders to claim ownership. Mosmof (talk) 04:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ako21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ako21.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Palito1212 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 04:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bsowt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bsowt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fortunato luigi (notify | contribs).

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and #10. The uploader claims the image is a "visual companion", which suggests this is a decorative image. Also the source isn't really a source, but a fan site that takes other people's intellectual property and half-heartedly asks copyright holders to claim ownership. Mosmof (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AlexPeppe.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlexPeppe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alex Peppe (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 04:27, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bs oidiawt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bs oidiawt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alkclark (notify | contribs).

Fails multiple WP:NFCCs: decorative image with unknown source. Mosmof (talk) 04:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Glo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wilsonbiggs (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aliciadine150kb-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aliciadine150kb-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mvoliphant (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 04:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No foreseeable encyclopedic use for this orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KiltieTrumpet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:KiltieTrumpet.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kristinajo (notify | contribs).

OR, flash reflection & focus make this generally unusable Skier Dude (talk) 04:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Justifed stripped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Justifed stripped.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alkclark (notify | contribs).

Not a promotional photo as claimed, but an editorial photo for Rolling Stone magazine. Does not describe the article subject in any way. Mosmof (talk) 04:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This non-free image adds nothing to the article, and its fair-use rationale is unconvincing. Fails WP:NFCC. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:T-c-f.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:T-c-f.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tonyandclaire (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:40, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TFA podcast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TFA podcast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gretnablues (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Table2spql.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table2spql.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Trakhtenberg (notify | contribs).

orphaned; easily replaceable by text Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Table2aspql.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Table2aspql.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Trakhtenberg (notify | contribs).

orphaned; easily replaceable by text Skier Dude (talk) 04:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tcatp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tcatp.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tonyandclaire (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Diltb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diltb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alkclark (notify | contribs).

Decorative image with no contextual significance Mosmof (talk) 04:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clttt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clttt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tonyandclaire (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Bobby Show 0001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Bobby Show 0001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ELF TV (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thebobbyandduckshow.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thebobbyandduckshow.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ELF TV (notify | contribs).

OR, uploaded by blocked user, no encyc value Skier Dude (talk) 05:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jipi's Corner 0001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jipi's Corner 0001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ELF TV (notify | contribs).

OR, uploaded by blocked user, no encyc value Skier Dude (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Howard Johnson Experience Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Howard Johnson Experience Logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nevbox (notify | contribs).

OR, user-created art not used on article Skier Dude (talk) 05:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thomas.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tjsoccerspock (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tomwatkinsface.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomwatkinsface.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Stepneyjack (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Travis tails in the park by schoolboy124.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travis tails in the park by schoolboy124.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fastturtle10 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gaia wulf by schoolboy124.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gaia wulf by schoolboy124.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fastturtle10 (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 05:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twatlighjt.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twatlighjt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samanthasuavez (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 06:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richard Alden Samuel McCroskey III mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Alden Samuel McCroskey III mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Klassikkomies (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of a living person. Yes he is in jail (as are many people) but as a living person it is possible to create free image of him. THis image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 06:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: No use deleting this file. McCroskey is suspected of killing six people and this picture is needed to illustrate Farmville murders article. I also remind you that we have whole category Category:Mug shots. If this file is deleted pictures of other living people in Mug shots category should also be deleted. Klassikkomies (talk) 06:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And three of those so far are nominated below. For many of the mugshots the subject is long dead and perhaps the photo is irreplaceable. For this one I can't see any such problem. - Peripitus (Talk) 21:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lets try this one more time. Image clearly meets: Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. No free equivalent, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose is available, could be created or is likely to ever become available as the subject is incarcerated and accused of murdering six people.[1] Subject has also confessed murdering these people to his friend[2] so it is very, very unlikely indeed that he is ever getting out of jail. No free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. If you have free image of McCroskey upload it now or admit that it is impossible to get one and stop wasting peoples time. Klassikkomies (talk) 00:32, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is going to trial and will be photographed, I would expect, many times. Someone could attend the court case and take a photo. he is not yet in jail for life but will make many appearances before that possible eventuality. I am not wasting people's time, just pointing out that there is no compelling reason for this image. - Peripitus (Talk) 01:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photos that may be taken by journalists in the courtroom will not free and we can't use them in the article. No one that we know is attending the court case and taking a photo of the subject. And we know no one will. Why would somene do that? I repeat: there are and most likely will never be no free images of the suspect and we need an image for visual identification of the subject in the Farmville murders article. This is the only image that we have and most likely will ever have and because of that there is no acceptable reason for deleting one and only image of the suspected murderer. Klassikkomies (talk) 02:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other's apart from journalists can attend. Attending and taking a photo of this is no harder than tracking down a celebrity and taking a free image. That taking an image is difficult is not a reason to host a non-free image - Peripitus (Talk) 02:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that someone just might (even though we know no one will) attend the courtcase with a camera and to crown all take a photo Richard Alden Samuel McCroskey who appears even in his (now defunct) MySpace page hooded and face obscured by bandanna is not a reason for deleting only image we have and most likely will ever have. Klassikkomies (talk) 03:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vfmaccommandant.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G1 by Anetode (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:08, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vfmaccommandant.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cascadesystems (notify | contribs).

OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 06:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DHS PAC Gallery 16may09.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DHS PAC Gallery 16may09.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dunmanhigh (notify | contribs).

Although the image is properly licensed and is used in the article "Dunman High School", it is completely out of focus and thus of extremely poor quality. In addition, it only appears in a gallery in the article, and so is not really necessary to the article. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 08:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - As Jacklee notes above, the file is properly licensed and used in an article. It appears that the image was intentionally blurred to "...protect privacy of audiences present." I think this is a valid reason for the blurring.--Rockfang (talk) 11:13, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Whoops, didn't notice that statement. Sorry. I still don't think it's a very useful image, though. Perhaps if the blurring had been applied in a more targeted way to obscure the most recognizable faces it would have been better. By making the whole image out of focus it just doesn't show anything at all, really. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 14:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would be ashamed to upload an image as crap as this. The photographer must be prepared to pixillate each face as mentioned above. They also insult the local language by uploading here rather than to the Commons. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:54, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, sorry but this is utterly useless. Stifle (talk) 11:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007.11.29 - Joesph Saia and Patrick Quigley-AHS.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:2007.11.29 - Joesph Saia and Patrick Quigley-AHS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by English836 (notify | contribs).

non-free image used in a gallery, adding little or nothing to the article. Does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 08:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 08:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Myisha Farrell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Colds7ream (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myisha Farrell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BigCoop (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of a living person who, according to the article, is not incarcerated or otherwise impossible to photograph. Image is replaceable with a free alternative and fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 08:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Forbes Smiley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Forbes Smiley.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikiwhatnot (notify | contribs).

unsourced, apparently non-free image of a living person of whom there could have a replacement free photo taken - fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a free alternative. Peripitus (Talk) 08:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It is sourced as a mugshot and considering that the subject is currently incarcerated, it is irreplaceable in terms of Wikipedia policy. Need a rationale, that's about it. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 04:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The original source is not identified, though admittedly sourcing this should not be difficult. It is not irreplaceable. He was sentenced (according to the article) to three and a half years imprisonment, three years ago. He will be out next year (if he is not released already) and so a free image could be created then. There is no reason we cannot wait that short time - Peripitus (Talk) 07:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not the way it works: if it is currently irreplaceable, it is currently irreplaceable. Further, if the person in question is a not a public figure, creating a free alternative may not be plausible since we have to respect that person's right to privacy. Oh, and mugshots are pretty easy to source. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 21:32, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have to strongly disagree with you here. The policy clearly states that it almost always presumed we can obtain a free image of a living person. Your interpretation sets a bar far too low - Peripitus (Talk) 00:09, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - I have to strongly disagree with you as well, WP:UCS. The guidelines dictate deletion only when the possibility of creating a free alternative becomes a realistic option. This is the long accepted standard interpretation of policy, as the future, and all inherent possibilities entailed therein, is considered to be indeterminate by a vast majority of sentient creatures. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 11:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- While we quote essays etc.... There is no deadline. So if the image is kept, in six months(ish) the man is released and the image gets nominated again possibly. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Of course, I did not mean to imply otherwise. ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 16:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matthew N Wright.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Matthew N Wright.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew wright (notify | contribs).

Orphan. File was uploaded to be used in a spam article which has now been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MWICPS crest bw.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MWICPS crest bw.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew wright (notify | contribs).

Orphan. File was uploaded to be used in a spam article which has now been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wikipedia Press Photo Tie Chalkboard Pose 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wikipedia Press Photo Tie Chalkboard Pose 2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthew wright (notify | contribs).

Orphan. File was uploaded to be used in a spam article which has now been deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:04, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tydb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tydb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BeaverWithChainsaw (notify | contribs).

Appears to have no purpose; uploaded for the purposes of vandalism by (now blocked) user with a record of falsely claiming to have created third-party images. Pseudomonas_(talk) 15:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juneangela 18.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juneangela 18.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Oanabay04 (notify | contribs).

Would tag "replaceable" but it's a little more complicated. The image is used in two articles. One is to identify the actress, which is unnecessary as she is still alive. The other use is to illustrate a subsection of The Electric Company (1971 TV series), but the rationale in either use is quite unclear. I would recommend that both rationales fail, and thus the image should be deleted. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I added fair use/rationale added for clarityOanabay04 (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think. Fair-use rationale for this non-free image is legitimate enough for its use in The Electric Company (1971 TV series), as the image is likely non-replaceable. Its fair-use rationale for its use in the actress's article is invalid because the actress is living. However, I think the validity of the fair-use rationale in the first case cancels out the lack of a legitimate one in the second one, allowing the image to be kept. Please correct me if my understanding of policy is wrong in any way on this. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Zsa Zsa Gabor Mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zsa Zsa Gabor Mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mike Nobody (notify | contribs).

I cannot see why, to illustrate Zsa Zsa Gabor being arrested, we need a non-free image of her. The image adds nothing of significance to the article, the topic is adequately described with text alone, and this image fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 22:14, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment are mugshots non-free content? Or is the non-free tag incorrect? 76.66.197.2 (talk) 04:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FBI and Federal prison mugshots are (usually) free, but ones by local police departments (like this one from the Beverley Hills Police Department ) are usually non-free - Peripitus (Talk) 07:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yasmine Bleeth mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted. Wizardman 23:25, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yasmine Bleeth mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AnonEMouse (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of Yasmine Bleeth after her arrest. There is no discussion of her appearance in the article and nothing in the text nor the images rationale that shows why we have this image. It is purely decorative, can be effectively (for the purposes of reader's understanding) replaced with text and fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 22:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The image is irreplaceable as it portrays a very important section in her life, her cocaine addiction, which was a life changing experience, and her arrest was a very important result. It also illustrates the effect of her addiction in a way that words can't. We can't "replace it with text" - saying what cocaine did to an actress famed for her beauty would be Wikipedia:original research - we can only show it. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 04:12, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are reading lot into this image. Where is a reliable source commenting on her appearance as related to the drug ? I just see a photo of a person looking as most do in mugshots - bad hair, without makeup and lacking all celebrity zing. Without a source (somewhere) discussing her appearance in this image surely an assertion as above is original research. If secondary sources don't think it worth talking about then neither should an encyclopedia - 07:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

That's a reasonable argument.

Commenting on her appearance as related to the drug (her own words:)

http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-01-09-bleeth_x.htm "At first, in 1998, cocaine was a social thing, says Bleeth, 34. Then she realized she could call a dealer and have it delivered to her home, "like ordering Chinese food." It soon became all she could think about: coming home from work to do lines ... Bleeth stopped seeing friends. She often had bloody noses. "And if I was sniffling, my publicist would tell people I had sinus problems, which I do." By the end of 1999, she "looked like an alien," she says." USA Today

Discussing her appearance in this image specifically:

http://www.answers.com/topic/yasmine-bleeth "A shocking photograph of Bleeth following a 36-hour drug bender showed that cocaine had ravaged the actress once voted one of the 50 most beautiful people ever by People Magazine" ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
http://www.hollywood.com/celebrity/188600/Yasmine_Bleeth "By 2001, Bleeth’s addiction became public knowledge when her horrifying mug shot was plastered all over the news media, following her arrest in Detroit for crashing her rental car into a median (the police found liquid cocaine in the car). The image of the formerly gorgeous actress, with bags under her bloodshot eyes and her nose noticeably deformed from years of snorting, showed how far her star had fallen"

Qualifies? --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 13:17, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment are mugshots non-free content? Or is the non-free tag incorrect? 76.66.197.2 (talk) 04:49, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's debatable. US Federal mugshots are clearly free content; state and local agencies aren't as clear, some claim copyright on theirs, some don't. Michigan ... ? Just in case, I'm defending it under irreplaceable fair use grounds. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 05:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Young Frank Calabrese, Sr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young Frank Calabrese, Sr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson Noel (notify | contribs).

additional non-free image to simply show the subject at a younger age than the existing one. His appearance over time seems not to be significant and is not discussed in the article. Image fails WP:NFCC#8 (does not significantly add to reader's understanding) and WP:NFCC#3a (excessive use) - Peripitus (Talk) 22:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WhiteyBulgeryoung.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WhiteyBulgeryoung.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson Noel (notify | contribs).

non-free image in an article with an existing one of the subject. His appearance at a younger age is not discussed, not justified on the image page and does not significantly add to reader's understanding. Image fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 22:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:It is not necessary that his appearance be discussed for the image to be kept. The image is relevant to illustrate Bulger during his years as a young criminal, when he was starting out in his criminal career. While there is no discussion about his younger age, there is a sub-section entitled "Early career", and the image is necessary to illustrate Bulger as a young criminal. Santiago Matamoros 22:42, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But why is it necessary ?. What of significance does the photo of him at a younger age add to reader's understanding. It is not necessary that each subject in an article be illustrated and this image just decorates a section, rather than meeting the NFCC requirements - Peripitus (Talk) 23:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's because an image of Bulger at a younger age helps the readers to get a better picture and judge for themselves as to the kind of person he was in his youth. Santiago Matamoros 00:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Without sourced discussion of his younger appearance that argument is not compelling. The same argument could be used for any person. "help"ing readers is very different from significantly increasing their understanding - Peripitus (Talk) 01:08, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And the argument would still remain valid. It will help readers increase their understanding. A sourced commentary on appearance would still not be required, as the image is used to portray Bulger during his early years and when he started on in his criminal career. There is enough sourced commentary about his early years and criminal career in the article. Santiago Matamoros 01:18, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#10c. Stifle (talk) 11:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it does not fail either. Regarding WP:NFCC#1, there is no free equivalent for this image. Bulger is now old and a fugitive. You cannot just go back in time to create one. As for WP:NFCC#10c, an appropriate non free fair use rationale has been inserted. Santiago Matamoros 22:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree with Santiago here. This is a weird, common-sense exception to WP:NFCC#1. Technically, a free alternative could be created but because of Bulger's fugitive status, that would be highly implausible. For all intensive purposes, this is not replaceable. I also think this meets WP:NFCC#8, as the image can conceivably enhance a reader's understanding of the subject. Finally, I'm unsure of whether this image meets WP:NFCC#3a, but it's clearly debatable. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is a rather large difference between conceivably enhancing a reader's understanding and significantly enhancing it. You do not seem to have argued in a way that matches the letter or intent of NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 07:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(changed my name) I have already explained as to how it would meet WP:NFCC#8 earlier.Joyson Konkani 07:54, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Webb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Webb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chingpshreo (notify | contribs).

Non free image of a living person. The article states "Webb was released from prison on August 22, 2002." - clearly replaceable with a free alternative and so fails WP:NFCC#1 - Peripitus (Talk) 22:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a replaceable non-free image of a living person, per WP:NFCC#1. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:VincenzoLicciardiMugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:VincenzoLicciardiMugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson Noel (notify | contribs).

Additional non-free image in an article. The existing one, of him being arrested, appears sufficient and this one fails WP:NFCC#3a as excessive use - Peripitus (Talk) 22:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agreed! Santiago Matamoros 22:35, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a replaceable non-free image of a living person, per WP:NFCC#1. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Umer Hayat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Umer Hayat.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fordmadoxfraud (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of living person. I cannot see any reason that this is not replaceable with a free alternative. The image may be PD but without a source it cannot be verified. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and is also lacking a source - Peripitus (Talk) 22:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 22:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It was something I uploaded a long time ago. Looking back, I no longer see its inclusion on Wikipedia as supportable. Ford MF (talk) 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tupac-mugshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tupac-mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ted87 (notify | contribs).

we need to see Tupac's arrest mugshot because.......? I cannot see any compelling reason nor what this additional non-free image adds to the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 22:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Traficantmug.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traficantmug.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Matthewdkaufman (notify | contribs).

non-free image in an article with an existing free one of the subject. Does not add significantly to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8. It is used in another article but there is no rationale at all for that one Peripitus (Talk) 22:43, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tallaal adrey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tallaal adrey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Longhair (notify | contribs).

non-free image of a living subject. He is not in Gaol for long and a free image could be created. Fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 22:55, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stephanie Studebaker.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephanie Studebaker.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Asbl (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of a living person. I cannot see how here appearance when arrested is of particular significance. This image could adequately be replaced with a free alternative. Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 22:57, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note that the previous debate (which I closed as keep) is Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2008_July_24. I cannot see any argument there for why the image is required for the discussion of here arrest. - Peripitus (Talk) 22:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shauntay Henderson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shauntay Henderson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karppinen (notify | contribs).

non-free image of a living person. She has not, and appears unlikely to be, sentenced to a life or close to sentence. A free image could be created and this one fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SeanRamaleyMugShot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SeanRamaleyMugShot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by HoboJones (notify | contribs).

non-free of a living person. A free image could be taken (this image fails WP:NFCC#1) and I do not see how his appearance when arrested, compared to his appearance today, is of any significance to a reader (fails WP:NFCC#8) Peripitus (Talk) 23:39, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SandraÁvilaBeltrán.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:SandraÁvilaBeltrán.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Joyson Noel (notify | contribs).

non-free image of a widely photographed living person. From what I can see in the article, and on the www, a free image could be created and this one fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:44, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Even though all the images of her are not free or were taken by the media, she is still in custody awaiting her sentence. As such, it is unclear whether she will be acquitted or convicted. As such, it is not clear whether a future image could be taken or not. Santiago Matamoros 01:21, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ron Artest mugshot 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ron Artest mugshot 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bender235 (notify | contribs).

non-free image of a person, of whom we have free images, simply used to illustrate a section on his arrest. His appearance when arrested is not discussed nor of significance for reader's understanding. Image is adequately replaced by the existing free image, or text in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 23:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richard Marin Scrushy Mug Shot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Richard Marin Scrushy Mug Shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AuburnPilot (notify | contribs).

Non-free image of a living person who has been sentenced to a relatively short time in prison. A free image could either be created today, or when he is released. This image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 23:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is quite unreasonable to expect a free image of an incarcerated person to become available while they reside in a federal prison. I have gone to great lengths to find a free alternative, contacting Scrushy's company and attorney but have had no luck. As the image description page indicates, I also went as far as to file a Freedom of Information Act request for the USDOJ's mug shot, but I was turned down. The letter I received claimed that personally identifiable information (including images) will not be released without the authorization of the individual. This image does not remotely fail WP:NFCC#1, unless Peripitus believes the DOJ is going to allow somebody to enter a federal prison, snap a shot of Scrushy, and post it on Wikipedia. --auburnpilot talk 03:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we need an image while he is incarcerated ? Why cannot we wait until he is released in not many years from now ? He is making (from what I can see) court appearances where it is possible to photograph him and it's not like he's in for life. I do appreciate the efforts you've gone to for an image, but (there always is one) we clearly could get a free image of him.....there is nothing in the policy that talks about now' - 04:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Right, I'll be sure to stand outside the prison for the next 7 years, hoping and praying I get a chance to take his photo. --auburnpilot talk 05:56, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Give me the address....I'll send coffee, donuts, and a hat. Seriously though, I don't think either of us is going to convince the other here - Peripitus (Talk) 11:07, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I believe that this mug shot is likely public domain anyway, and in no way fails NFCCC. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PurpleAki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PurpleAki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marwood (notify | contribs).

non-free image of a living person. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with the free image that could be created Peripitus (Talk) 23:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.